Krunal Pandya in line for India T20I return after Axar Patel’s struggles

Published - 31 Aug 2026, 11:59 AM | Updated - 31 Aug 2026, 12:25 PM

Hardik Pandya And Krunal Pandya
Image Credits: X

Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) all-rounder Krunal Pandya is being discussed as a potential option for India’s T20I squad as the team management reviews its choices in the shortest format.

The move comes after Axar Patel produced modest returns across India's recent assignments against England and Ireland, prompting the management to reassess its left-arm spin options.

Also Read: Hardik Pandya, Nitish Kumar Reddy fully fit for Afghanistan T20Is, Washington Sundar on track

Krunal Pandya’s India T20I comeback becomes a possibility

India are exploring alternatives in the left-arm spin department after Axar's returns remained underwhelming across the seven matches he played against England and Ireland.

Krunal Pandya has emerged as one of the names being considered for the role, as per a report in Times of India. The all-rounder has not played a T20I for India since the 2021 series against Sri Lanka, but his performances in the IPL have kept him in contention.

The 2026 IPL season was particularly encouraging for Krunal, who picked up 14 wickets for Royal Challengers Bengaluru.

Also Read: Krunal Pandya shares honest feelings on missing India comeback

Krunal Pandya vs Axar Patel in IPL - Full comparison

Krunal Pandya and Axar Patel have both been regular Indian all-rounders in the IPL, but their recent five-season numbers show different trends. From IPL 2022 to 2026, Krunal has scored 839 runs and taken 56 wickets, while Axar has accumulated 1,136 runs and claimed 44 wickets.

With the bat, Axar has been the more productive of the two over this period. He scored 182 runs in 2022, followed by 283, 235, 263 and 173 runs in the next four seasons. Krunal, meanwhile, recorded 183, 188, 133, 109 and 226 runs respectively. Krunal's 2026 season was his best of the five-year period, with 226 runs for Royal Challengers Bengaluru.

IPL SeasonKrunal RunsAxar Runs
2022183182
2023188283
2024133235
2025109263
2026226173
Total8391,136

With the ball, however, Krunal has the advantage. He took 10 wickets in 2022, nine in 2023 and six in 2024 before producing 17 wickets in 2025 and another 14 in 2026. Axar picked up 6, 11, 11, 5 and 11 wickets respectively across the same seasons. Overall, the five-season IPL numbers show Axar Patel's greater batting output, while Krunal Pandya has contributed more wickets.

IPL SeasonKrunal WicketsAxar Wickets
2022106
2023911
2024611
2025175
20261411
Total5644

Krunal Pandya vs Axar Patel in international cricket - Full comparison

The international comparison is less straightforward because Axar has played considerably more cricket for India. Krunal's international career has been limited to ODIs and T20Is, whereas Axar has represented India in all three formats.

With the bat, Krunal has scored 130 runs in five ODIs and 124 runs in 19 T20Is. Axar's numbers are significantly higher, with 688 Test runs, 918 ODI runs and 750 T20I runs. He has also played 15 Tests, 74 ODIs and 101 T20Is.

FormatKrunal RunsAxar Runs
Tests688
ODIs130918
T20Is124750

The bowling numbers also heavily favour Axar because of his much larger international workload. Krunal has taken two ODI wickets and 15 T20I wickets, while Axar has 57 Test wickets, 80 ODI wickets and 101 T20I wickets.

Therefore, Axar has a clear advantage in overall international numbers, while Krunal's recent IPL bowling form provides a strong argument for his potential return to India's T20I setup.

FormatKrunal WicketsAxar Wickets
Tests57
ODIs280
T20Is15101

Also Read: Jasprit Bumrah injury update: Pacer confirmed for Asian Games comeback

Sonanchal Gautam
Sonanchal Gautam

Sonanchal Gautam is the Head of Content and Senior Editor with over 5 years of experience in the ind...

logo
Stay Updated with the Latest Cricket News from Cricket Addictor.

You will receive the latest updates on cricket news throughout the day. You can manage them whenever you need in browser settings.