It's Redundant Now With The LED Stumps To Have The Bails On - Sanjay Manjrekar

Former India batter Sanjay Manjrekar says bails are “redundant” in the present cricket, and should be discarded because “they add a lot of complexities” to an all-around complex set of rules.

The discussion was set off after Yuzvendra Chahal was denied an “obvious wicket” when he beat David Warner in the air and off the pitch to hit the wicket. Be that as it may, while the stumps illuminated, the bails didn’t fall, in this manner neglecting to satisfy a significant prerequisite of the bowled regulation.

Bails Should Be Done Away With: Sanjay Manjrekar

It is broadly accepted bails were utilized in cricket in the pre-innovation period to be certain the ball had hit the wicket. Sanjay Manjrekar, and numerous different intellectuals, accept that given the present innovation, the bails should be done away with.

The LED bails presently being used light up the second they lose contact with the remainder of the wicket, which is likewise utilized as the case the wicket was broken for reasons for actually taking a look at run-outs and stumpings. Assuming the bails were to be discarded, it ought not to be excessively hard to have wickets that light up the second they are contacted.

“I’ve said this before as well, it’s redundant now with the LED stumps to have the bails on,” Manjrekar said on ESPNcricinfo’s T20 Time: Out.

“Today it would’ve been a wicket deserving for Chahal who bowled superbly. It was a terrible shot from Warner, and it didn’t get a wicket. Unless it’s adding an aesthetic value, they should just get rid of the bails because they’re completely redundant with LED technology.

“[The bails were used] just to be sure the ball has hit the stumps they had these bails on top, because if the ball just kissed the stumps you won’t know if there weren’t any bails,” Manjrekar said. “And the bails were meant to fall off if the stumps were disturbed.

“But now that you have a sensor, you know the ball has hit the stumps, so why are the bails there?”

Holding Bails Any Longer Defying Common Sense: Sanjay Manjrekar

Sanjay Manjrekar has forever been for innovation assuming a larger part in cricket. In 2013, he called for technology to screen bowling actions live around the time the ICC had started to brace down on suspect actions.

He referred to additional examples, as on account of a puzzling allure where umpires are compelled to check when the bails fall off the section while adjudicating. This he felt was adding layers of intricacy to decision-making and holding bails any longer was “defying common sense.”

“If you have the technology, don’t have the bails,” he said. “The other problem with bails is, when there is a stumping, you wait to it to light up and then you’re talking about whether both the bails are off the grooves and there’s just a lot of complication when you’re judging stumped or run out. Just keep it simple.

“I know it won’t happen because we don’t like to change too many things. We tweak a few other rules, but certain very obvious things aren’t done. Getting rid of bails may sound scandalous to a lot of people but it defies common sense.”

Piyush Chawla Agrees With Sanjay Manjrekar’s Idea

Piyush Chawla, the India legspinner, upheld Sanjay Manjrekar’s hypothesis and trusted better sense would win. Assuming the LED innovation was accessible and it was trusted to give “obvious proof”, it ought to be taken.

“When you have clear evidence, why not,” he asked: “That’s what I believe in. We clearly saw it hit the stump, but the bails didn’t fall off and he survived, and he was riding on luck, because there was a dropped catch and then this.

Maybe if they got a wicket there, it was a different story altogether. There should be some rules where if the ball hit the stumps and the LED glows, it should be given out.”

Also Read: CSK vs MI: “No Better Place To Try And Blood A Youngster” – Michael Vaughan On CSK Vs MI Clash